Teodor Moscu on 22.06.41, Potez or P.37 he escorted?

Of course I take responsibilty for it is written. The fact is that there is a Gen Denes not read with understanding too again?

The fact is that there is not possible to 22.06 41 96 squadron had 40 I-153, which is total nonsense.

If the author writes such pure nonsense, that mean that he did not make any good work but a big mumbo-jumbo (the other offensive word is big... and nice "work").

Take myself, as a man, own civil liability for own poor work and for own large errors in it. Either you have moral courage or not?

With all respect
Mirosłąw Wawrzyński

This seems to be personal. Maybe, as a "private matter", this hsould be sorted out over PM.

Mirek, they say that "success is the best revenge". If you want to really "hurt" Denes, all you need to do is write more books, better books. It is as simple as that.

Radu

Radu belive or not but this is not personal. It is waste of time.

I do it for many years (writing books and articles), this is no problem. Having such personal expirence I know more then well about writing books and articles and their real value and of coures about errors too.

I like it when things are good done. I do not write in my publications fictitious information, any error can happen. I check several times before publish.


mw

PS
Just now has been edited in Poland 2-ed part my long stroy about Soviet attacks on Berlin in VIII-IX 1941 ( 1. MTAP + DBA) form Estonian island Ozylia/Sarema. No problem, this is not a first articel edited by me in 2014, and I hope not last

The whole book about Soviet aviation over Poland in 1939 I printed in 2008, it is dane many years ago.

Mirek,
All your posts contain some kind of "dig" or "bite" at Denes. That makes it "personal". Whatever you have to sort out with him, do it in private.
Just like many others here I am interested in what you have to share, and please do share, but I seriously doubt that anyone here is interested in scandals, rows, attacks.
Play the ball not the player. Everyone knows of Suarez, but not for his goals.
Radu

Radu this disscusion is a pure nonsens, and waste time

I do not say never and never write that "Denes is an total "idiot" for examle, his is not of course, but he is a good guy, and is OK. It is a very stupid and nonsense sentence indeed, which have been never surface .

I said, that Denes wrote in own book (FBTO Vol 1) some prure nonsens (not solid work, and of courese ...) or you may finad a few pure mumbo-jumbo on the begining, no matter later. It is not a point.

A level of mambo-jumbo in his book is quite "funy", this is strange but I mentioned it several times crealy earlier in this post, openly, under own real name. Not hiding behind the screen, any nick as "rabarbar-983/324"

This is an attack on a ball not on a player as you wish.


I propose to finnish this out of topic discusion, waste of time, it leads to nowhere

mw

Mirek... you keep saying that you "have no problem with Denes" and then follow it with nastiness about Denes. Even if Denes is wrong, you have no right to say such nasty things about him. You have to stop these attacks. If you have anything to say about aviation, then say what you have to say about aviation, we are all listening. But if you want to insult and sling mud (about anyone!) please go elsewhere.
Play the ball (Aviation) not the player (Denes).
Radu

Topic locked for cleaning. Further discussion is pointless at this moment.