Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Bf 109G coded with additional letters
catch 22
Posted: December 10, 2013 02:02 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Member No.: 2356
Joined: January 08, 2009



Gentlemen,
I always wondered (but never "dared" to ask about dry.gif), what are the small letters added to some of the numbers of ARR Bf 109?
I know 2 popular photos of a/cs coded in this manner. The first one is from the book “Romanian Aeronautics in the Second World War":
user posted image
And the second one is from a source I don't remember any more, but it can be seen in the collection of photos @ the Falcon's Messerschmitt Bf 109 Hangar site here:
user posted image
As per the description from the above site, the additional letters were used on the second (or third etc.) a/c coded with the same number. If so, on the second photo this must be the third a/c coded 23 in one and the same unit.
Is this the correct explanation? Is it known when these “extended” numbers were in use?
Thanks in advance!

PMEmail Poster
Top
Cantacuzino
Posted: December 10, 2013 02:42 pm
Quote Post


Host
Group Icon

Group: Hosts
Posts: 2328
Member No.: 144
Joined: November 17, 2003



QUOTE
Gentlemen,
I always wondered (but never "dared" to ask about ), what are the small letters added to some of the numbers of ARR Bf 109?
As per the description from the above site, the additional letters were used on the second (or third etc.) a/c coded with the same number. If so, on the second photo this must be the third a/c coded 23 in one and the same unit.
Is this the correct explanation? Is it known when these “extended” numbers were in use?
Thanks in advance!


The description on the site is correct. The suffix letter ( a, b , c) added to the number denote the change of the lost plane with a new one in the same unit.
The "extended" numbers for Bf 109G were in use starting with summer '43 with Grupul 7Vt and later with "Grupul 9Vt" on russian front until spring 44. In summer 44 there were no evidence of the use of such identification ( probably due to the many Bf-109 received in both units and few pilots available to fly them)
PM
Top
catch 22
Posted: December 10, 2013 03:16 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Member No.: 2356
Joined: January 08, 2009



QUOTE (Cantacuzino @ December 10, 2013 02:42 pm)
In summer 44 there were no evidence of the use of such identification ( probably due to the many Bf-109 received in both units and few pilots available to fly them)

Thank you very much - your answer is highly appreciated!
PMEmail Poster
Top
C-2
Posted: December 11, 2013 05:06 am
Quote Post


General Medic
Group Icon

Group: Hosts
Posts: 2453
Member No.: 19
Joined: June 23, 2003



Same was with the Ju 88's
PMUsers Website
Top
Alexei2102
Posted: December 11, 2013 06:36 am
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1352
Member No.: 888
Joined: April 24, 2006



And HS129s
PMEmail Poster
Top
catch 22
Posted: December 12, 2013 12:23 am
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Member No.: 2356
Joined: January 08, 2009



QUOTE (C-2 @ December 11, 2013 05:06 am)
Same was with the Ju 88's

QUOTE (Alexei2102 @ December 11, 2013 06:36 am)
And HS129s

Yep! Now when you mention it, I see I didn't check my references very well (e.g. Denes' book, page 57/58 or "Romanian Aeronautics" page 196).
Thanks again!
PMEmail Poster
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0334 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]