What's next?, next war Romanians could be part of

Again:

Because it's a frozen conflict and the great powers are interested in seeing a settlement reached. Just like they're involved in the Middle East peace process.

MMM, thank you - I should have checked Wikipedia, indeed.
So the European Union existed in 1991 - we agree on this. That was my main reason for adding few words.
* * *
Regarding advertisement: They change all the time, any time you re-enter into web page. I should have mentioned that.

This post has been edited by Florin on October 17, 2012 11:17 pm

For whom is rearming Russia at Dinestr river, asked Petru Bogatu:

http://bogatu.voceabasarabiei.net/?p=2221

Again:

Because it's a frozen conflict and the great powers are interested in seeing a settlement reached. Just like they're involved in the Middle East peace process.

Yeehah!
Middle East + Oil = Love(le)
Transdnestra + Germany + USSR - Romania = Ribe-Molo?!
(it's as simple as that!)
I might agree with your "let them go" theory if it weren't for the "domino theory" (see the Yugoslavian bloody factfile).

What do you mean by that "equation"? I'm not sure I understand exactly. You mean a kind of new Ribe-Molo agreement?
And what is the domino theory?

Yep, a new "big powers" arrangement without consulting the small(er) countries; more like a Munchen, actually...
As for the "domino theory", check the involution of Yugoslavia towards today's Serbia (without the so-called Kosovo Country): first came off Croatia and Slovenia, then Bosnia, then Macedonia (FYROM, thanks to Greece), then finally Montenegro. Isn't it like a domino string falling? (Note: avoid comparing this to a dismemberment by four camels! )

A big powers arrangement is not necessarily a bad thing. Especially if it puts an end to a difficult issue. But I don't see one for the time being.

I don't see what the big risk of a domino effect would be in Moldova's case. Gagauzia would also secede. So what. Gagauzia already has the right to secede if Moldova ever wants to unite with Romania.

Again, it's a question of what the Moldovans really want. To re-gain and keep territorities with foreign, pro-Russian populations or to move towards the West and/or potentially unite with Romania at some point.

p.s. Consider this scenario. Moldova gets Transdniester back. With strings attached! Years later Moldova wants to join NATO. Transdniester threatens secession. A referendum is called and the Moldovan Communist party uses the Transdniester secession and patriotism card to stir anti-NATO opinions. If that somehow doesn't work, Transdniester secedes again. Now, if Transdniester were a seperate state it wouldn't have the right to impose anything concerning Moldova's foreign policy. And it would no longer have the secession-threat leverage.

This post has been edited by Imperialist on October 20, 2012 06:46 pm

Here is what a Russian newspaper is saying about Filat's visit in Moscow and talks with Putin:

http://www.publika.md/filat-ii-promite-lui...ei_1087221.html

Their stupid obsession with Transdniester...

Last events in Bucarest:

http://www.hotnews.ro/stiri-opinii-1350476...ra-ruseasca.htm

Strange story. Why would the "spy" need to physically take the documents out of the country? They invented scanners and emails for 007's sake!

My question about this, too! Maybe is an item to put some pressure against Russians, about other problems?

http://bogatu.voceabasarabiei.net/?p=2251

http://www.cristiannegrea.ro/?p=322

Rogozin: scared?!?!
Sorry, contras, for "stealing your thunder"...
However, what's that 1992 agreement? Between Moldavia and Russia or what?
Is this the one?
Joint Control Commission

This post has been edited by MMM on February 07, 2013 09:06 am

http://jurnal.md/ro/news/ursul-se-inclina-...bogatu-1055015/