Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> He111 H-6
raevski
Posted: January 06, 2010 03:39 am
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 64
Member No.: 1824
Joined: February 04, 2008



He 111H-6
Does anyone know for sure whether or not for sure that The Romanian one ever carried torpedoes?

They were capable but did they have them, or were they ever used?

This post has been edited by raevski on January 06, 2010 03:40 am
PMEmail Poster
Top
Victor
Posted: January 06, 2010 05:36 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4350
Member No.: 3
Joined: February 11, 2003



The 78th Bomber Sqyadron never made a torpedo attack.
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
dragos
Posted: January 07, 2010 01:57 am
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 2397
Member No.: 2
Joined: February 11, 2003



The original question stands. Did we have torpedoes for these planes in the ammunition dumps?
PMUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
raevski
Posted: January 07, 2010 05:34 am
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 64
Member No.: 1824
Joined: February 04, 2008



also what about anti shipping attacks. Were there any successful attacks against soviet craft?
PMEmail Poster
Top
Radub
Posted: January 07, 2010 09:51 am
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1670
Member No.: 476
Joined: January 23, 2005



QUOTE (dragos @ January 07, 2010 01:57 am)
Did we have torpedoes for these planes in the ammunition dumps?

Well, the standard German "aerial torpedo" was the standard F5b marine torpedo fitted with a stabiliser in the tail - this stabiliser was a box-shaped aerodynamic device made from wood, it was intended to stabilise the toropedo in the air (keep it level) and it removed itself on impact with the water. The torpedo modified like this was renamed LT-F5b (where LT stands for Lufttorpedo).
A similar arrangeent was used in conjunction with the F5w torpedo, although the stabiliser was different. This aerial torpedo was seldom used.
The Romanian Navy used the F5b torpedo.
However, I have no knowledge of LT-F5b torpedoes on any Romanian aicrfaft. (the Ju88 was also able to carry them).
Torpedoes were carried on external PVC1006B bomb racks.
HTH
Radu
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Radub
Posted: January 08, 2010 09:45 am
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1670
Member No.: 476
Joined: January 23, 2005



One clarification: I had a discussion with somebody who knows torpedoes better than I wink.gif and this is what I found:
The German naval torpedo was the G7 type. This was not used/modified for aerial use.
The aerial torpedo was the LT-F5b, which was designed from the very beginning for aerial use with an aerial device in the tail that separated on impact.

I was wrong when I wrote that the Romanian Navy used the F5b torpedo - I meant that they used the G7. A G7 torpedo is on display in the Navy Museum in Constanta.

Radu
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
raevski
Posted: January 09, 2010 02:35 am
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 64
Member No.: 1824
Joined: February 04, 2008



ok then it is pretty safe for me to assume that although they were capable of carrying torps they didn't. They never trained for torpedo attacks ? because they didn't have them?
PMEmail Poster
Top
Radub
Posted: January 09, 2010 09:50 am
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1670
Member No.: 476
Joined: January 23, 2005



QUOTE (raevski @ January 09, 2010 02:35 am)
ok then it is pretty safe for me to assume that although they were capable of carrying torps they didn't.

I do not really think they were "capable". The aircraft also needed a specialised sight to launch the torpedo at the optimal range and height. Torpedo carriers were quite specialised, not the usual bomber loaded with a torpedo.
Radu

This post has been edited by Radub on January 09, 2010 09:50 am
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
raevski
Posted: January 11, 2010 05:27 am
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 64
Member No.: 1824
Joined: February 04, 2008



QUOTE (Radub @ January 09, 2010 09:50 am)
QUOTE (raevski @ January 09, 2010 02:35 am)
ok then it is pretty safe for me to assume that although they were capable of carrying torps they didn't.

I do not really think they were "capable". The aircraft also needed a specialised sight to launch the torpedo at the optimal range and height. Torpedo carriers were quite specialised, not the usual bomber loaded with a torpedo.
Radu

i was under the belief that the H-6 had that
PMEmail Poster
Top
Radub
Posted: January 11, 2010 02:19 pm
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1670
Member No.: 476
Joined: January 23, 2005



OK, without getting lost in semantics, the He111 H-6 was "capable" to carry torpedoes, but in order to do so, it had to be converted by the addition of what was called a "Rustsatz C", which included the external torpedo racks and the sighting device.
HTH
Radu

This post has been edited by Radub on January 11, 2010 02:19 pm
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
raevski
Posted: January 11, 2010 11:23 pm
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 64
Member No.: 1824
Joined: February 04, 2008



thank you smile.gif
PMEmail Poster
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0149 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]