Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



Pages: (2) 1 [2]   ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Romanian subs
Dénes
Posted: October 19, 2003 07:45 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



QUOTE
is this\"laid down?\"

"Laid down" could have several meanings. One is - how can I say it neutrally? - "copulation" :oops:
Are you familiar with the poems of Jim Morrison from "The Doors"? There the topic is reoccurring.

Dénes
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Victor
Posted: October 19, 2003 07:53 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4350
Member No.: 3
Joined: February 11, 2003



I really doubt Jim Morrison was thinking at submarines when using the "laid" term. Maybe torpedoes? biggrin.gif
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Dénes
Posted: October 19, 2003 08:27 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



One never knows. "Submarine" could have several meanings, too... laugh.gif

Dénes
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Andreas von Mach
Posted: October 19, 2003 09:02 pm
Quote Post


Caporal
*

Group: Members
Posts: 138
Member No.: 84
Joined: August 19, 2003



Laid Down
Launching
etc are not important terms in live of one ships.
They are very important for shipyard, as they are usually
one of two most important , that aftre them shipyard
received parts of payment. On this way they are cleary
defined as these should be some responsible persons
on the side of the purchasers, who accepted the terms.
Even when the ships was built for the Romanian Navy
at Navy Shipyard, and they both belongs to Marine Ministerium.
PM
Top
Tiornu
Posted: October 19, 2003 09:44 pm
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 83
Member No.: 75
Joined: August 08, 2003



I must admit, I was never much of a fan of The Doors or of Jim Morrison. However, there are many shades of meaning to the term "laid down" that do not involve an exchange of bodily fluids. It is supposed to denote the very beginning of construction, when assembled materials are first joined together. Sometimes there would be a ceremony involved, hardly as grand as a launching.
Launching would seem to be the event least liable to confusion, but it seems there was some "wiggle room" in this concept as well.
Sometimes the date of completion was made equal to the date of commissioning. Or it might be the date when the ship was handed over for trials, or the date when trials were completed, or...whatever. Each navy had its own definition, and that definition could change over time.
PM
Top
Andreas von Mach
Posted: October 20, 2003 12:28 am
Quote Post


Caporal
*

Group: Members
Posts: 138
Member No.: 84
Joined: August 19, 2003



It it always a problem of money :!: :!: :!:
PM
Top
Andreas von Mach
Posted: October 23, 2003 11:29 pm
Quote Post


Caporal
*

Group: Members
Posts: 138
Member No.: 84
Joined: August 19, 2003



Soviet submarine:
TS-2 ex MARSUINUL sunk 29 Feb 1945 at Poti due to torpedo explosion
28 Feb 1945 refloated and put again into service.
PM
Top
Tiornu
Posted: October 24, 2003 12:43 am
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 83
Member No.: 75
Joined: August 08, 2003



That's interesting. Does anyone have any further details?
PM
Top
Wings_of_wrath
Posted: February 18, 2007 04:23 pm
Quote Post


Caporal
*

Group: Members
Posts: 136
Member No.: 809
Joined: February 04, 2006



By the way, on the WW2 website, the picture displayed in the profile of the NMS Marsuinul in in fact that of German U-boat U-26, of the Type I A.

For comparison, here is the picture from the site and a model of the U-25, the only other boat in the class:

user posted image

user posted image

(second picture is from here)
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Pages: (2) 1 [2]  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.1920 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]