
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
Pages: (3) 1 [2] 3 ( Go to first unread post ) | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Dénes |
Posted: March 31, 2006 12:07 am
|
||
![]() Admin ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 4368 Member No.: 4 Joined: June 17, 2003 ![]() |
This photo was published (also) in my book on ARR, by Squadron/Signal (p.53). Gen. Dénes |
||
Ruy Aballe |
Posted: March 31, 2006 02:13 pm
|
Plutonier major ![]() Group: Members Posts: 307 Member No.: 247 Joined: March 18, 2004 ![]() |
I noticed that the ailerons of He 111 H-3 "20" seem to have been painted in a strinkingly light colour. This is apparent in the photo posted by 109, but also in the post by Cantacuzino (image from Romanian Aeronautics-Editura Modelism) and in the photo published in Dénes' book; in the last one, the colour almost matches the white trim of the elaborate Michael wing crosses.
Any ideas?? Ruy |
kokta |
Posted: April 06, 2006 02:02 pm
|
Soldat ![]() Group: Members Posts: 13 Member No.: 784 Joined: January 17, 2006 ![]() |
Hello everybody,
1) Thanks for your answers and contributions to a discussion. 2) I saw the other forum about the romanian He-111 but I can not insert the questions. I registered already 2 days ago and permanently I have displayed „The selected user has been deactivated or has not been activated yet“. So I take the liberty of adding the question there : Unfortunately I don´t understand romanian languange but I think, in the other forum the last scheme posted by 1-0-9 is correct, isn´t it ??? 3) I will post some informations about the He-111 kit after talking to my friend who is building this kit. 4) In summary, there is a few observations for now : The romanian He-111 had the emblem of 5thBG on the left side. Upper surfaces were painted in RLM 61,62,63 with yellow wing tips. The He-111 upper wing surfaces had the big „complicate“ crosses. The cowlings are probably in RLM 61 ( based on some photos). Some of the He-111´s ailerons were painted in an unknown light color. David |
Cantacuzino |
Posted: April 06, 2006 02:43 pm
|
||
![]() Host ![]() Group: Hosts Posts: 2328 Member No.: 144 Joined: November 17, 2003 ![]() |
Yes, it's more appropiate last scheme of upper cammo (RLM 61, 62, 63). but the light color ailerons ( grey ?) , yellow wingtip and big crosses on wings you can use it only for He -111 H3 no. 20 (it could be some diference for other He 111 numbers). I didn't see pictures with left side of this He 111 no 20 but I believe has painted the missions bars on left side fuselage. This post has been edited by Cantacuzino on April 07, 2006 03:58 am |
||
mgc151184 |
Posted: April 06, 2006 03:39 pm
|
![]() Soldat ![]() Group: Members Posts: 43 Member No.: 552 Joined: March 30, 2005 ![]() |
|
Dénes |
Posted: April 06, 2006 05:12 pm
|
![]() Admin ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 4368 Member No.: 4 Joined: June 17, 2003 ![]() |
Also - as said above - the wingtips and ailerons (perhaps the engine cowlings, too) were painted in different colours. Gen. Dénes This post has been edited by Cantacuzino on April 07, 2006 03:55 am |
Cantacuzino |
Posted: April 06, 2006 05:22 pm
|
![]() Host ![]() Group: Hosts Posts: 2328 Member No.: 144 Joined: November 17, 2003 ![]() |
|
Cantacuzino |
Posted: April 06, 2006 05:34 pm
|
||
![]() Host ![]() Group: Hosts Posts: 2328 Member No.: 144 Joined: November 17, 2003 ![]() |
|
||
Cantacuzino |
Posted: April 06, 2006 05:41 pm
|
![]() Host ![]() Group: Hosts Posts: 2328 Member No.: 144 Joined: November 17, 2003 ![]() |
|
mgc151184 |
Posted: April 06, 2006 05:54 pm
|
![]() Soldat ![]() Group: Members Posts: 43 Member No.: 552 Joined: March 30, 2005 ![]() |
I forget to tell that the colors used by the Rumanian He111 H3 (in my opinion)are RLM 61,62,63.
I put the photo for the camouflage scheme not for RLM referent (see the left wing) |
mgc151184 |
Posted: April 06, 2006 06:03 pm
|
![]() Soldat ![]() Group: Members Posts: 43 Member No.: 552 Joined: March 30, 2005 ![]() |
![]() This post has been edited by Cantacuzino on April 07, 2006 03:52 am |
mgc151184 |
Posted: April 06, 2006 06:22 pm
|
![]() Soldat ![]() Group: Members Posts: 43 Member No.: 552 Joined: March 30, 2005 ![]() |
![]() Photo from Denes book. This post has been edited by Cantacuzino on April 07, 2006 03:52 am |
Cantacuzino |
Posted: April 06, 2006 06:56 pm
|
||
![]() Host ![]() Group: Hosts Posts: 2328 Member No.: 144 Joined: November 17, 2003 ![]() |
|
||
Dénes |
Posted: April 06, 2006 07:32 pm
|
||
![]() Admin ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 4368 Member No.: 4 Joined: June 17, 2003 ![]() |
Why was the coloured drawing switched with a black/white one? This way, my comments are pointless. As for the camouflage colours, I already identified them as RLM 61/62/63/65 in my Squadron/Signal book on ARR, published in 1999 (rear cover). Gen. Dénes |
||
Cantacuzino |
Posted: April 07, 2006 03:38 am
|
||||
![]() Host ![]() Group: Hosts Posts: 2328 Member No.: 144 Joined: November 17, 2003 ![]() |
Because MGC made a mistake with the color drawing. He wanted a RLM 61,62,63 (dark brown, medium green and grey colors) cammo but instead he posted a close to RLM 71,72,02 (dark green ,medium green, and grey) cammo color drawing. Quote MGC:
All of us were foolish by this mistake. ![]() ![]() This post has been edited by Cantacuzino on April 07, 2006 03:42 am |
||||
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |