Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



Pages: (5) « First ... 3 4 [5]   ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Maresal tank destroyer, development
mabadesc
Posted: December 29, 2008 12:02 am
Quote Post


Locotenent colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 803
Member No.: 40
Joined: July 11, 2003



Guys,

The germans had multiple projects of transforming various tank platforms into tank destroyers. The idea of using 38(t), pz I, pzII, pzIII, pzIV, V and VI chassis and transforming them into tank destroyers was well recognized and developed in Germany. Multiple parallel experimental projects and variants were in process.

I have the same archival report from Dragos03 - I believe we obtained it at the same time, several years ago. It's interesting, but IMO quite inconclusive in establishing whether the German technical envoy - Ventz - was "inspired" by the idea of the "Maresal".

Let's not forget the industrial capacity of Germany vs. Romania, and the number of projects the Germans had in producing prototypes of light, maneouvreable tank destroyers.

Regardless, the Hetzer (whether "inspired" or not by the "Maresal") went into production (though too late in the war) and was very effective on the battlefield and ended up being used by the Swiss army until the 1970's.

Were it not for the Hetzer, the Jagdpanzer IV (also reaching production too late), was very effective as well on the battlefield.

The Maresal had the misfortune of not making it to production, unfortunately.

In any case, let's keep things in perspective, however. I find the archival document very inconclusive and insufficient in establishing that the Germans inspired themselves after the Maresal. In any case, if it they did or not, the production of a light and nimble tank destroyer was a high priority on Guderian's list and it would have been developed anyway.

No offence intended regarding the Romanian know-how, we had some smart and innovative engineers, but the country's industrial capacity for mass production of armored vehicles was limited at best.
PM
Top
brano
Posted: January 16, 2011 08:18 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Member No.: 1553
Joined: August 22, 2007



Hi guys,
i have question for M-06. Existing this prototype ? Your specifications... ? Existing summary for all prototypes in publications, website ...? Weight, lenght, wide etc....more data ?
THX
Braňo
PMEmail Poster
Top
MMM
Posted: January 17, 2011 02:55 pm
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1463
Member No.: 2323
Joined: December 02, 2008



QUOTE (mabadesc @ December 29, 2008 03:02 am)
the country's industrial capacity for mass production of armored vehicles was limited at best.

I don't know how to put it, but even this is an optimistic approach!
@brano: check out this forum, search the terms and you'll get a result!


--------------------
M
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
Alanmccoubrey
Posted: January 18, 2011 02:46 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 38
Member No.: 1520
Joined: July 28, 2007



QUOTE (mabadesc @ December 26, 2005 09:11 pm)
QUOTE
Ventz said that after Romania will have 1000 Maresals the Romanian army will be much more effective, and the Maresal will prove to be "ein grosser Hetzer" for the Russians.


Doesn't this imply, however, that the Hetzer was already in existence while trials were barely being carried out for the Maresal?

If this was taking place in Jnuary 1944 then the Ventz might well have been aware of the developement of the Jagdpanzer 38 but as it certainly wasn't called the "Hetzer" by the Germans yet why would he say such a thing unless he meant the proper meaning of the German word "Hetzer", which is "trouble maker". So perhaps Ventz just meant that the Maresal would cause the Russians a lot of trouble ?
PMEmail Poster
Top
ANDREAS
Posted: July 21, 2012 01:20 pm
Quote Post


Locotenent colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 814
Member No.: 2421
Joined: March 15, 2009



PMEmail PosterYahoo
Top
muggs
Posted: July 21, 2012 02:18 pm
Quote Post


Plutonier
*

Group: Retired
Posts: 298
Member No.: 1499
Joined: July 05, 2007



If i remember correctly these are fantasy drawings made for a game.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Dénes
Posted: July 21, 2012 02:25 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



If these are fantasy drawings, they are done with a great amount of authenticity. They can easily fool anyone, even specialist ones. This is partly a compliment, partly a warning to a potentially dangerous situation of faking history.

Gen. Dénes

This post has been edited by Dénes on July 21, 2012 02:26 pm
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
dragos
Posted: July 21, 2012 04:59 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 2397
Member No.: 2
Joined: February 11, 2003



PMUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
ANDREAS
Posted: July 22, 2012 09:58 am
Quote Post


Locotenent colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 814
Member No.: 2421
Joined: March 15, 2009



I'm sorry, I didn't knew! The only doubt I had was about the drive wheels in front and rear that looks like Pz.III early version, which were no longer produced from 1941 I guess, but I couldn't be sure about it! Anyway it's good that we cleared this pictures problem right now!
PMEmail PosterYahoo
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Pages: (5) « First ... 3 4 [5]  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0421 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]