![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
| Pages: (3) 1 2 [3] ( Go to first unread post ) | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Wings_of_wrath |
Posted: February 05, 2006 10:55 pm
|
|
Caporal Group: Members Posts: 136 Member No.: 809 Joined: February 04, 2006 |
Well, it's as close as I'll ever get to flying a Me 109...
|
| D13-th_Toppy |
Posted: February 06, 2006 02:21 am
|
||
|
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 29 Member No.: 372 Joined: October 17, 2004 |
the Mg-131 did use HE rounds, but to be honest, since i haven't shot one at anyone's throat -yet- This post has been edited by D13-th_Toppy on February 06, 2006 02:22 am |
||
| Cristian |
Posted: February 08, 2006 03:42 pm
|
||
|
Plutonier Group: Members Posts: 250 Member No.: 415 Joined: December 10, 2004 |
Don't underestimate the power of the 13mm electric primed round for MG 131. The bullet weight is between 34-38,5 grams and the energy around 9500 Joules.At such energy, a seat armor have only a"pshychological protection".Note that any obstacle initiate the ricochet effect, and the bullet start turning and hiting often not with the nose, but with the side, generating devastating wounds.And a pilot is not a target for direct hits , but for ricochets, because the bullet hit the plane body first. |
||
| Wings_of_wrath |
Posted: February 08, 2006 07:00 pm
|
|
Caporal Group: Members Posts: 136 Member No.: 809 Joined: February 04, 2006 |
There are a lot more factors to the problem than raw projectile power. The position of the armour plate (or laminated glass panels), the speed and attitude of the aircraft, the spot where the shell hits...
Of course that under the right circumstances a 13mm round (HE I doubt, since they explode on contact, and are not designed to pierce armour*) can penetrate the cockpit. Wherever that kind of round would still pack enough punch to decapitate someone shortly afterwards is still subject to question though. Personally, I think that to be rather unlikely, and wouch for the "20mm" theory. But short of actual experimentation with both projectiles and a piece of aircraft armour, I see this debate going on forever. Anyway, here's some more information about 13 mm (MG 131) ammunition I managed to dig up from the ol' 'net: AP - Panzergranatpatrone L'spur o. Zerl HE - Brandsprenggranatpatronen L'spur o. Zerl The 13mm Panzergranatpatrone was a solid AP round. The Brandsprenggranatpatrone was a conventional HE/I round, a bored-out projectile filled with an explosive mixture. German armourers were warned that the first round fired had to be an AP round: The cap over the muzzle had to be destroyed first, and there was the possibility that the HE/I round would go off when it hit this. Note that for both rounds, tracer was chosen (L'spur, or Leuchtspur) but that there was no selfdestruction (o. Zerl, or ohne Zerlegerung). See the source of this information here * Cockpit armour for the Me 109 G-2 was: Headrest - 9.4 mm, Side armoured plating -4.4 mm, Seat 8 mm. From the G-6s, the top of the headrest armour was replaced with a 60mm thick pane of buletproof laminated glass, the same as the cockpit roof. Often, damaged planes of older versions were retrofitted with this feature while in the factory for repairs. Some of the info above comes from a wartime russian report on the Me 109, translated here |
| Cristian |
Posted: February 09, 2006 06:47 am
|
||
|
Plutonier Group: Members Posts: 250 Member No.: 415 Joined: December 10, 2004 |
You're right! I've made my comment looking back for my experiments witha 30-06 hunting rifle.I had fired several shots in the field against a wreck of a mud tank of a abandoned oilfield equipment. The mud tank wall was 3mm steel plate. The 30-06 (8-10 grams weight and around 2800J energy) penetrate the first wall (round hole), start spining and penetrate the oposite wall creting a big irregular split arround 7 cm long, and go away. If such a small bullet can do such damage, what a 13mm can do? |
||
| Wings_of_wrath |
Posted: February 09, 2006 10:14 am
|
|
Caporal Group: Members Posts: 136 Member No.: 809 Joined: February 04, 2006 |
The armour plate on an airplane is made of much stronger steel than an old rusty metal oil tank! It is supposed to guard against bullet penetration, and by the time it reaches it, the round has allready penetrated the outer skin of the aircraft, and possibly the radio that is located behind the pilot's seat. If it were so useless as you are trying to suggest, why would they keep it there in the first place? Even if the round wold reach the armour, it would be so deformed by this time, that penetration would be nearly impossible. A HE round would have long before that, exploded in contact with the outer skin.
And a 6cm thick peice of tempered, laminated glass (in fact both glass and acrilic panels laminated together , to make the compound even stronger) would stop even a 13mm dead in its tracks if fired at it directly. A HE round wouldn't even scratch it, because the explosion will happen at the surface, and the gases will take the path of least resistance- outwards... An AP will probably penetrate it, but then I doubt it would have enough force to do furter damage. But I just realised how pointless this debate is in the first place: I'm sure Hpt. Lipfert was shooting all his guns at Darjan, not just the 20mm or the 13mm, so it was the combined effect of all tis types of ammunition hitting almost simultaneously that caused his death, not a single, magic, bullet. It could well be that he was killed by a 13mm after a 20mm pulverised the seat armour. We don't know that, and there is no way we will ever know. In the end, he was still killed, and I'm sure his memory is worth more than an aimless dispute over what could and could not have caused his demise. This post has been edited by Wings_of_wrath on February 09, 2006 10:21 am |
| fekiac |
Posted: May 02, 2007 06:14 pm
|
||||||
|
Soldat Group: Members Posts: 9 Member No.: 1408 Joined: May 02, 2007 |
Wings of wrath, could you find the issue of Aeromagazin about C. Cantacuzino in the meantime? Would you be so kind to advice an exact number/year of the Aeromagazin? Or instantly to send the whole article? Anybody else could advice? Thanks in advance Fekiac This post has been edited by fekiac on May 02, 2007 06:17 pm |
||||||
Pages: (3) 1 2 [3] |
![]() ![]() ![]() |