Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> 60 years since the Ardennes Offensive, 16 December 1944 - 16 December 2004
Florin
Posted: December 16, 2004 07:15 am
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1879
Member No.: 17
Joined: June 22, 2003



Exactly 60 years ago, on 16 December 1944, the Germans started their Ardennes Offensive, also called "The battle of The Bulge".

This post has been edited by Florin on December 16, 2004 07:24 am
PM
Top
Iamandi
Posted: December 16, 2004 08:04 am
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1386
Member No.: 319
Joined: August 04, 2004




And this winter is so different from that winter. I don't know how it is now in Ardennes, but here is like is not winter... Santa Claus dont came this year, because his vechicle is just for snow...

Iama
PMUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
Florin
Posted: December 17, 2004 08:15 pm
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1879
Member No.: 17
Joined: June 22, 2003



QUOTE (Iamandi @ Dec 16 2004, 03:04 AM)
And this winter is so different from that winter. I don't know how it is now in Ardennes, but here is like is not winter...

Iama

We, the humans, have some guilt in that, by keeping polluting our atmosphere with carbon dioxide from burnt coal.

The biggest polluters from burnt coal are:

The United States dry.gif mad.gif sad.gif dry.gif mad.gif

China dry.gif mad.gif sad.gif dry.gif

Russia dry.gif mad.gif sad.gif

Maybe also India, even though she may be still polluting less than some Western European countries... sad.gif
PM
Top
Dénes
Posted: December 17, 2004 08:53 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Benoit Douville
Posted: December 18, 2004 12:38 am
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 43
Member No.: 16
Joined: June 22, 2003



60 years ago the Germans almost did it to the amazement of the Western Allies. That's a pretty interesting Battle to study and with the U.S. involment in that Battle they are tones of litterature on the subject...

Regards
PM
Top
Florin
Posted: December 18, 2004 03:19 am
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1879
Member No.: 17
Joined: June 22, 2003



The U. S. Army suffered the most casualties counted for a single battle, considering any war other than the Civil War.

Maybe even including the Civil War, but I am not sure... sad.gif

This post has been edited by Florin on December 18, 2004 03:20 am
PM
Top
Florin
Posted: December 18, 2004 03:41 am
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1879
Member No.: 17
Joined: June 22, 2003



QUOTE (Dénes @ Dec 17 2004, 03:53 PM)
Article on CNN:
http://edition.cnn.com/2004/US/12/16/battle.bulge/index.html

Col. Dénes


Regarding the article on CNN, higlighted on a Internet link here:

We can read:

.......a U.S. Army intelligence and reconnaissance platoon made up of 18 elite soldiers .......On December 16, a huge column of German paratroopers got wind of Bouck's platoon, dug in on that hill.

The Germans threw some 700 men, in three waves, at Lyle Bouck and 17 other Americans.....by day's end, hundreds of Germans were dead.

Some Americans were badly wounded, but not one was killed, and they were captured only when they ran out of ammunition.


And now here it comes, the best part:

"Had they not stood and held the Germans and halted their attack, or rather postponed it for a crucial 24 hours, the Battle of the Bulge would have been a great German victory," says Kershaw.

And now my dumb question: Is this last remark quoted from CNN referring to the 18 soldiers, or to the all 3 American Armies? According to my understanding, it refers only to the 18 guys! laugh.gif

A re-enacting of Thermopile, with the paratroopers as Persians! biggrin.gif

I am glad that in this moment, right after reading the article, I am about to go to bed and take a good sleep.

Brainwashing, sweet brainwashing...

This post has been edited by Florin on December 18, 2004 03:44 am
PM
Top
Benoit Douville
Posted: December 18, 2004 05:53 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 43
Member No.: 16
Joined: June 22, 2003



Battle of the Bulge:

-100 000 German casualties, killed, wounded or captured.

-81 000 American casualties, including 23 554 captured and 19 000 killed.

-1 400 British casualties and 200 killed.

-800 tanks lost on each side.

- 1000 German Luftwaffe Airplanes lost.

-The Malmedy Massacre, where 86 American soldiers were murdered, was the worst atrocity committed against American troops during the course of the war in Europe.

-the Battle of the Bulge was the worst battles in terms of losses to the American Forces in World War II.

Regards

This post has been edited by Benoit Douville on December 18, 2004 05:54 pm
PM
Top
Florin
Posted: December 25, 2004 01:51 am
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1879
Member No.: 17
Joined: June 22, 2003



QUOTE (Benoit Douville @ Dec 18 2004, 12:53 PM)
...........................................
- 1000 German Luftwaffe Airplanes lost.
..........................................
Regards

What is not mentioned in that list from the Internet site where you picked the data is that Luftwaffe performed a raid in the first hours of January 1st, 1945, and they destroyed on the Allied airfields almost 1000 American and British airplanes.

This post has been edited by Florin on December 25, 2004 01:51 am
PM
Top
Florin
Posted: January 21, 2005 02:44 am
Quote Post


General de corp de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1879
Member No.: 17
Joined: June 22, 2003



German paratroopers in philately...

Source: Scan of personal stamp, at 600 ppi

Attached Image
Attached Image
PM
Top
PanzerKing
Posted: January 23, 2005 12:22 am
Quote Post


Sergent major
*

Group: Members
Posts: 216
Member No.: 29
Joined: July 07, 2003



My father just bought a copy of WWII Presents: Battle of the Bulge, it is an amazing magazine with about 10 unique stories. Some are told by veterans and others are articles by historians. There also some great pictures.

PMUsers WebsiteMSN
Top
PanzerKing
Posted: January 23, 2005 12:25 am
Quote Post


Sergent major
*

Group: Members
Posts: 216
Member No.: 29
Joined: July 07, 2003



QUOTE (Florin @ Dec 25 2004, 01:51 AM)
QUOTE (Benoit Douville @ Dec 18 2004, 12:53 PM)
...........................................
- 1000 German Luftwaffe Airplanes lost.
..........................................
Regards

What is not mentioned in that list from the Internet site where you picked the data is that Luftwaffe performed a raid in the first hours of January 1st, 1945, and they destroyed on the Allied airfields almost 1000 American and British airplanes.

Actually, Operation Bodenplatte wasn't a success at all. Nowhere near 1000 allied planes were destroyed, more like 350. Worst of all for the Luftwaffe, many of their last experienced pilots were killed.
PMUsers WebsiteMSN
Top
Chandernagore
Posted: January 23, 2005 11:57 am
Quote Post


Locotenent colonel
Group Icon

Group: Banned
Posts: 818
Member No.: 106
Joined: September 22, 2003



QUOTE
60 years ago the Germans almost did it to the amazement of the Western Allies


The allies were certainly amazed but the German never came close to do it. My personal view is that they had almost 0% chance sucess from the start. It's a bit like Nappy in 1815. He could delay but he could no longer win anything.
PM
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0315 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]