WorldWar2.ro Forum -> Eastern front starts in 1942

Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website

Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines

Help

Members

Calendar

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Resend Validation Email

WorldWar2.ro Forum -> Operations & Battles -> WW2 in General

Pages: (5) 1 2 [3] 4 5 ( Go to first unread post )

Eastern front starts in 1942, What means that for ww2?

Track this topic | Email this topic | Print this topic

Alexandru H.	Posted: April 17, 2005 10:53 am
Sergent major Group: Banned Posts: 216 Member No.: 57 Joined: July 23, 2003	I think that in the case of a 1942 Barbarossa, the germans would have used this plan. This post has been edited by Alexandru H. on April 17, 2005 10:55 am

Victor	Posted: April 17, 2005 03:25 pm
Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4350 Member No.: 3 Joined: February 11, 2003	I suggest you both calm down and stop this nonsense. It isn't productive.

Imperialist	Posted: April 17, 2005 05:40 pm
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2399 Member No.: 499 Joined: February 09, 2005	* This post has been edited by Imperialist** on April 18, 2005 10:40 pm -------------------- I

Alexandru H.	Posted: April 17, 2005 06:09 pm
Sergent major Group: Banned Posts: 216 Member No.: 57 Joined: July 23, 2003	It's a better Barbarossa because it's a later Barbarossa.

Indrid

Posted: April 17, 2005 06:10 pm

Sublocotenent
Group Icon

Group: Banned
Posts: 425
Member No.: 142
Joined: November 15, 2003

QUOTE (Imperialist @ Apr 17 2005, 07:40 PM)

QUOTE (Alexandru H. @ Apr 17 2005, 10:53 AM)

I think that in the case of a 1942 Barbarossa, the germans would have used this plan.

Its seems the same Barbarossa to me...

p.s. what program did you use?

Microsoft paint, imo

seriously guys, if you put so many brakes on the car you should not worry it does not move. i mean, for a scenarion in which nothing seems to happen for one year, than one should use only the technologies at the time.

hell, it makes no sense....

C-2

Posted: April 17, 2005 07:08 pm

General Medic
Group Icon

Group: Hosts
Posts: 2453
Member No.: 19
Joined: June 23, 2003

QUOTE (Alexandru H. @ Apr 17 2005, 06:09 PM)

It's a better Barbarossa because it's a later Barbarossa.

A better Barbarosa is an earlier one...
If they wouldn't start it in late summer but in early spring ,who knows,maybee Stalingrad was in Moskow.

Imperialist	Posted: April 17, 2005 07:43 pm
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2399 Member No.: 499 Joined: February 09, 2005	* This post has been edited by Imperialist** on April 18, 2005 10:41 pm -------------------- I

Imperialist	Posted: April 17, 2005 07:48 pm
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2399 Member No.: 499 Joined: February 09, 2005	* This post has been edited by Imperialist** on April 18, 2005 10:39 pm -------------------- I

Iamandi	Posted: April 18, 2005 09:24 am
General de divizie Group: Members Posts: 1386 Member No.: 319 Joined: August 04, 2004	Hello boys, nice to see something was developing on this.. But, i don't like this little fight between Imperialist and Alexandru H., like Victor says - isn't productive. Alexandru - this topic was starded by me, and not by Imperialist, so stop acusing him. Change your target, to me ("vei paste iarba pe care o cunosti" ). About one of your posts, i want to say: before ww2 germans and russians have good military relations. And, the real problem was not because germans don't know enough about russians... but, was because russians know to much.. They buyed from Germany a lot of military technology, including prototypes, for study at home by reverse engenereeng. They buyed warships, planes, etc., and developed a lot using germans exeperience, even used germans mistakes to not do in russia the same things. And, T-34 like another succesfull tanks of ww2 was based on USA mistake to ignore Mr. Christy with his revolutionary projects in tank industry. Iama

Alexandru H.	Posted: April 18, 2005 09:41 am
Sergent major Group: Banned Posts: 216 Member No.: 57 Joined: July 23, 2003	Ignoring the last post, I think that Germany would have lost big time starting the war in 1942.

Imperialist

Posted: April 18, 2005 09:52 am

General de armata

Group: Members
Posts: 2399
Member No.: 499
Joined: February 09, 2005

QUOTE (Alexandru H. @ Apr 18 2005, 09:41 AM)

Ignoring the last post, I think that Germany would have lost big time starting the war in 1942.

Based on...?

--------------------

Alexandru H.	Posted: April 18, 2005 10:39 am
Sergent major Group: Banned Posts: 216 Member No.: 57 Joined: July 23, 2003	... God!

Imperialist	Posted: April 18, 2005 10:45 am
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2399 Member No.: 499 Joined: February 09, 2005	* This post has been edited by Imperialist** on April 18, 2005 10:41 pm -------------------- I

Alexandru H.	Posted: April 18, 2005 11:15 am
Sergent major Group: Banned Posts: 216 Member No.: 57 Joined: July 23, 2003	All I hear from you is chit-chat... What about the topic? Do you have any thoughts regarding it? I'm quite curious.

Imperialist	Posted: April 18, 2005 01:57 pm
General de armata Group: Members Posts: 2399 Member No.: 499 Joined: February 09, 2005	* This post has been edited by Imperialist** on April 18, 2005 10:38 pm -------------------- I

1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)

0 Members:

« Next Oldest | WW2 in General | Next Newest »

Pages: (5) 1 2 [3] 4 5

[ Script Execution time: 0.0098 ] [ 14 queries used ] [ GZIP Enabled ]