Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



Pages: (5) 1 2 [3] 4 5   ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Eastern front starts in 1942, What means that for ww2?
Alexandru H.
Posted: April 17, 2005 10:53 am
Quote Post


Sergent major
Group Icon

Group: Banned
Posts: 216
Member No.: 57
Joined: July 23, 2003



(IMG:http://img113.echo.cx/img113/6536/imperialistjoke4hn.gif)

I think that in the case of a 1942 Barbarossa, the germans would have used this plan.

This post has been edited by Alexandru H. on April 17, 2005 10:55 am
PMUsers Website
Top
Victor
Posted: April 17, 2005 03:25 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4336
Member No.: 3
Joined: February 11, 2003



I suggest you both calm down and stop this nonsense. It isn't productive.
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Imperialist
Posted: April 17, 2005 05:40 pm
Quote Post


General de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2399
Member No.: 499
Joined: February 09, 2005



***

This post has been edited by Imperialist on April 18, 2005 10:40 pm
PM
Top
Alexandru H.
Posted: April 17, 2005 06:09 pm
Quote Post


Sergent major
Group Icon

Group: Banned
Posts: 216
Member No.: 57
Joined: July 23, 2003



It's a better Barbarossa because it's a later Barbarossa. :lol:
PMUsers Website
Top
Indrid
Posted: April 17, 2005 06:10 pm
Quote Post


Sublocotenent
Group Icon

Group: Banned
Posts: 425
Member No.: 142
Joined: November 15, 2003



QUOTE (Imperialist @ Apr 17 2005, 07:40 PM)
QUOTE (Alexandru H. @ Apr 17 2005, 10:53 AM)


I think that in the case of a 1942 Barbarossa, the germans would have used this plan.

Its seems the same Barbarossa to me...

p.s. what program did you use?

Microsoft paint, imo :lol:

seriously guys, if you put so many brakes on the car you should not worry it does not move. i mean, for a scenarion in which nothing seems to happen for one year, than one should use only the technologies at the time.

hell, it makes no sense....
PMICQ
Top
C-2
Posted: April 17, 2005 07:08 pm
Quote Post


General Medic
Group Icon

Group: Hosts
Posts: 2453
Member No.: 19
Joined: June 23, 2003



QUOTE (Alexandru H. @ Apr 17 2005, 06:09 PM)
It's a better Barbarossa because it's a later Barbarossa. :lol:

A better Barbarosa is an earlier one...
If they wouldn't start it in late summer but in early spring ,who knows,maybee Stalingrad was in Moskow.
PMUsers Website
Top
Imperialist
Posted: April 17, 2005 07:43 pm
Quote Post


General de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2399
Member No.: 499
Joined: February 09, 2005



***

This post has been edited by Imperialist on April 18, 2005 10:41 pm
PM
Top
Imperialist
Posted: April 17, 2005 07:48 pm
Quote Post


General de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2399
Member No.: 499
Joined: February 09, 2005



***

This post has been edited by Imperialist on April 18, 2005 10:39 pm
PM
Top
Iamandi
Posted: April 18, 2005 09:24 am
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1386
Member No.: 319
Joined: August 04, 2004




Hello boys, nice to see something was developing on this..

But, i don't like this little fight between Imperialist and Alexandru H., like Victor says - isn't productive.

Alexandru - this topic was starded by me, and not by Imperialist, so stop acusing him. Change your target, to me ("vei paste iarba pe care o cunosti" :D ). About one of your posts, i want to say: before ww2 germans and russians have good military relations. And, the real problem was not because germans don't know enough about russians... but, was because russians know to much.. They buyed from Germany a lot of military technology, including prototypes, for study at home by reverse engenereeng. They buyed warships, planes, etc., and developed a lot using germans exeperience, even used germans mistakes to not do in russia the same things.
And, T-34 like another succesfull tanks of ww2 was based on USA mistake to ignore Mr. Christy with his revolutionary projects in tank industry.

Iama
PMUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
Alexandru H.
Posted: April 18, 2005 09:41 am
Quote Post


Sergent major
Group Icon

Group: Banned
Posts: 216
Member No.: 57
Joined: July 23, 2003



Ignoring the last post, I think that Germany would have lost big time starting the war in 1942.
PMUsers Website
Top
Imperialist
Posted: April 18, 2005 09:52 am
Quote Post


General de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2399
Member No.: 499
Joined: February 09, 2005



QUOTE (Alexandru H. @ Apr 18 2005, 09:41 AM)
Ignoring the last post, I think that Germany would have lost big time starting the war in 1942.

Based on...?
PM
Top
Alexandru H.
Posted: April 18, 2005 10:39 am
Quote Post


Sergent major
Group Icon

Group: Banned
Posts: 216
Member No.: 57
Joined: July 23, 2003



... God!
PMUsers Website
Top
Imperialist
Posted: April 18, 2005 10:45 am
Quote Post


General de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2399
Member No.: 499
Joined: February 09, 2005



***

This post has been edited by Imperialist on April 18, 2005 10:41 pm
PM
Top
Alexandru H.
Posted: April 18, 2005 11:15 am
Quote Post


Sergent major
Group Icon

Group: Banned
Posts: 216
Member No.: 57
Joined: July 23, 2003



All I hear from you is chit-chat... What about the topic? Do you have any thoughts regarding it? I'm quite curious.
PMUsers Website
Top
Imperialist
Posted: April 18, 2005 01:57 pm
Quote Post


General de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2399
Member No.: 499
Joined: February 09, 2005



***

This post has been edited by Imperialist on April 18, 2005 10:38 pm
PM
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Pages: (5) 1 2 [3] 4 5  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0347 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]