Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Sevastopol/Hersones '44
D13-th_Mytzu
Posted: September 30, 2004 09:45 am
Quote Post


General de brigada
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1058
Member No.: 328
Joined: August 20, 2004



Anyone knows how come that the hungarian ships Tissa and Budapest worked side by side with romanian and german ships to evacuate the romanian and german soldiers (+ slovacs and russians) from Sevastopol and Hersones in 1944 ?
PMUsers Website
Top
Iamandi
Posted: September 30, 2004 10:43 am
Quote Post


General de divizie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1386
Member No.: 319
Joined: August 04, 2004



From what point of view, you ask?
If it is a technical one, Danube ships (some of them) have had sea "walks" in good wheather conditions.

Iama
PMUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
Victor
Posted: September 30, 2004 01:03 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4350
Member No.: 3
Joined: February 11, 2003



QUOTE (Iamandi @ Sep 30 2004, 12:43 PM)
From what point of view, you ask?
If it is a technical one, Danube ships (some of them) have had sea "walks" in good wheather conditions.

Iama

The Tisza and the Budapest were seagoing ships, not river ships.
The Budapest was damaged by VVS-ChF aircraft on 6 May and the Tisza had the same fate on 11 May (it was towed back to Constanta IIRC).
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
D13-th_Mytzu
Posted: September 30, 2004 01:22 pm
Quote Post


General de brigada
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1058
Member No.: 328
Joined: August 20, 2004



Sorry I forgot to mention it is not the technical side I was interested in but the political one: how come that hungarian ships agreed to asist in the evacuation of romanian troops ? From what I have read so far Romania and Hungary were one step away from war during ww2.
PMUsers Website
Top
Victor
Posted: September 30, 2004 01:35 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4350
Member No.: 3
Joined: February 11, 2003



The Hungarian ships were subordinated to the German Black Sea Command and carried out the orders they received.
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Dénes
Posted: September 30, 2004 02:35 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



Victor is right. Despite obvious differences, both Rumania and Hungary were part of the Axis camp and fought for a common goal.
One should not always try "to stir the pot", as they say, when it comes to Hungary and Rumania. Today, the military of the two countries, allied again, have excellent relationships.

BTW, another Hungarian ship, the KOLOZSVÁR, 1200 tons, was also attacked on January 22, 1943, by Soviet aircraft of the Black Sea Fleet while docked in port [which one?]. It burned out, but did not sink.

Another one, UNGVÁR, 1031 tons, sunk on November 9, 1941, by a Soviet mine [where?]

MAGYAR VITÉZ (Hungarian Warrior) was sunk on May 10,1944, under Kriegsmarine flag and with German crew, while evacuating Sevastopol.

Does anyone have more details?

Gen. Dénes
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
D13-th_Mytzu
Posted: September 30, 2004 03:09 pm
Quote Post


General de brigada
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1058
Member No.: 328
Joined: August 20, 2004



Denes, I have hungarian friends and I think I broke the romania vs. hungary barrier some time ago - my question was strictly related to that era when both Hungary and Romania kept troops at their comun borders and provocations were made, as I said they were one small step away from war.

Unfortunatelly I do not know about those two ships but I will ask a hungarian friend who has a particular interest in navy.
PMUsers Website
Top
Victor
Posted: September 30, 2004 07:34 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4350
Member No.: 3
Joined: February 11, 2003



QUOTE (Dénes @ Sep 30 2004, 04:35 PM)
Another one, UNGVÁR, 1031 tons, sunk on November 9, 1941, by a Soviet mine [where?]

The Ungvar was carrying ammunitions and eventually blew up, taking two Romanian Vosper class MTBs with it. The Romanian ships were then attempting to rescue survivors, but the blast was very powerful and given their small size they were also sunk.
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Dénes
Posted: September 30, 2004 08:26 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



Thanks, Victor.
Do you know where did this accident happen? Did every one die (both on Hungarian and Rumanian vessels)?

Gen. Dénes
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
dragos03
Posted: September 30, 2004 08:58 pm
Quote Post


Capitan
*

Group: Members
Posts: 641
Member No.: 163
Joined: December 13, 2003



These ships were sunk off Cape Carolina, near Bugaz, at the north-eastern edge of the Dniester liman. Some German ships were sunk too. There were survivors from all ships. 9 Romanian sailors died.
Ungvar was the first to hit a mine, it launched the lifeboats and the Romanian ships attepted to board it, but then a second explosion followed sinking all the 3 ships. Possible causes: it hit another mine or the ammo on board blew up.
The blast was so powerful that it damaged a Romanian seaplane who was also part of the escort.
PM
Top
Dénes
Posted: October 13, 2004 03:08 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



Recently a Navy history researcher informed me of a different desciption of the fate of transport ship UNGVÁR and the two Rumanian torpedo boats.

Here is the description of the event:
QUOTE
UNGVÁR, 1031 tons.
The ship formed a convoy with TISZA and two Rumanian torpedo boats type Vosper (bought from Great Britain in January 1940), VIJELIA and VISCOLUL. November 9, 1941, the convoy left the Danube estuary towards Ochakov-Nord. When negotiating a Soviet mine field, the convoy left the swept channel due to a navigational error. UNGVÁR hit a mine first. It was sinking slowly, and VIJELIA went to help its crew. But it also hit a mine and sunk fast. UNGVÁR was finally destroyed when the crude oil it was carrying exploded. VISCOLUL hit a mine later on and was similarly sunk.


Can sombody check out Rumanian (and other) sources and confirm, or infirm, this new version?

Gen. Dénes
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
dragos
Posted: October 13, 2004 03:54 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 2397
Member No.: 2
Joined: February 11, 2003



The book "Marina romana in al doilea razboi mondial" by Koslinski and Stanescu confirms this version, except that instead of VISCOLUL it was VIFORUL.

VIFORUL hit a mine after UNGVAR, then VIJELIA.
PMUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
Dénes
Posted: October 15, 2004 02:46 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



I was informed that the version I posted above comes from a book written by Craciunoiu: " Vedetele Torpiloare din Marina Romana", Bucuresti, ed. Modelism, 2003. So, whom we should believe now?

Gen. Dénes
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
dragos
Posted: October 15, 2004 05:12 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 2397
Member No.: 2
Joined: February 11, 2003



I would go with Koslinski's work. It also offers accounts of sailors that were on those ships.

For example, Ion Gociman, sergent torpilor on VIFORUL:

QUOTE
Asp. Cornateanu da pe loc ordin sa ne indreptam grabnic cu vedeta spre nava care lovise o alta mina. Stopam la oarecare distanta de ea. Ultima imagine pe care o pastrez de la bordul vedetei cuprinde pe comandant la comanda, pe timonierul Machedon undeva pe punte, pe camaradul Cocos care lasase la apa puiul (barca) vedetei in tribord pupa, langa aparatul fumigen, pe submaistrul Dragan cu capul scos prin chepengul de la motoare si pe maestrul Iepure care luase ancorotul in brate sa-l fundariseasca (...) cand s-a produs o flacara puternica urmata de o explozie. Am sarit in apa peste tubul lans-torpile babord.


9 Romanian sailors lost their lives on the two torpedo boats:

Aspirant Aurel Cornateanu
Aspirant Mircea Metz
Submaestru Dragan
Sergent T. Popovici
Fruntas R. Tataru
Fruntas Gh. Sarbu
Fruntas I. Vintila
Fruntas Gh. Niculescu
Fruntas C. Columbina
PMUsers WebsiteYahoo
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0363 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]