Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



Pages: (3) [1] 2 3   ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> 1/72 Me 109 E3 kit of Tiberiu Vinca
Bernard Miclescu
Posted: April 16, 2004 09:25 pm
Quote Post


Plutonier major
*

Group: Members
Posts: 335
Member No.: 53
Joined: July 22, 2003



I found this kit at AEROMODEL producer. The kit is not a very good one, but the decalls are quite great. Several versions, T vinca's , I DICezare, Lungulescu, Serbanescu.

Yours,
BM
PMMSN
Top
Québec
Posted: November 13, 2005 03:58 am
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 65
Member No.: 197
Joined: January 18, 2004



This is great news for 1/72 fans!!!!!! I just bought today in 1/48 Hasegawa's new Bf-109 E-3 Rumanian Air Force, with Tiberiu Vinca's plane on the box cover! Modelers of every scale, there's hope out there!!!!!!!!!!!
PMMSN
Top
Dénes
Posted: November 13, 2005 04:05 am
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



QUOTE (Québec @ Nov 13 2005, 09:58 AM)
I just bought today in 1/48 Hasegawa's new Bf-109 E-3 Rumanian Air Force, with Tiberiu Vinca's plane on the box cover!

Here is the box cover:

user posted image

Too bad, Vinca's 'Emils was actually an E-7, not an E-3...

Gen. Dénes
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Québec
Posted: November 15, 2005 05:01 am
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 65
Member No.: 197
Joined: January 18, 2004



Hello Dénes, according to my limited information on the plane, the difference between an E-7 and an E-3 (and 4) was the certerline rack for a fuel reservoir. The canopy, according to pictures in your book (Rumanian aces of World War 2) is the old style with light framing, so the one in the kit is good. Also, what model of spinner was on this plane?

Thanks!
PMMSN
Top
109
Posted: November 15, 2005 05:59 am
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 85
Member No.: 488
Joined: January 29, 2005



The main visual difference between a 109E3 and a E4 is the cockpit frame, square on the E4, round on the E3; the external difference between E4 and 7 is the spinner, pointed on E7.
Vinca's plane (64) was obviously an E3 as all the pictures show a round frame and short spinner.
So far i've only seen one romanian 109E that i can say for sure it's a E7...it's behind the 109E4 yellow 65. It's number, most probably 63.
This is of course considering ONLY external marks.

user posted image

Source of the photos, internet.

This post has been edited by 109 on November 15, 2005 05:59 am
PMEmail Poster
Top
Dénes
Posted: November 15, 2005 06:26 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



QUOTE (109 @ Nov 15 2005, 11:59 AM)
The main visual difference between a 109E3 and a E4 is the cockpit frame, square on the E4, round on the E3; the external difference between E4 and 7 is the spinner, pointed on E7.
Vinca's plane (64) was obviously an E3 as all the pictures show a round frame and short spinner.
So far i've only seen one romanian 109E that i can say for sure it's a E7...it's behind the 109E4 yellow 65. It's number, most probably 63.
This is of course considering ONLY external marks.

Those features were interchangeable, thus they don't clearly denote the sub-type.

Vinca's 'Emil' was an early production E-3 (W.Nr. 704), which was upgraded by the Germans to E-7 standard.

Gen. Dénes
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
109
Posted: November 15, 2005 07:27 pm
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 85
Member No.: 488
Joined: January 29, 2005



As a modeler i don't care much about what electric switches inside make the difference between an e3 an a e7 , but in the external details that make a model.
Vinca is sitting next to his No. 64 109E , the plane has rounded canopy and short spinner, thus EXTERNALLY (as i previously mentioned) an E3. Therefore if I don't intend that my 1/72 model would fire electrically or pneumatically the cannons or carry external loads, i MUST buy an E3 in order to depict Vinca's plane, not an E7.
IF the Germans had ever upgraded the E3 to E7 standard, they for sure did not change enything outside, it was only wiring and other minor changes INSIDE. That is if they ever did that.
Anyone knows: E1-E3=round canopy , E4-E9 squared canopy.

user posted image

Source.Aripi Romanesti WWII collection
PMEmail Poster
Top
Dénes
Posted: November 15, 2005 08:40 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



QUOTE (109 @ Nov 16 2005, 01:27 AM)
As a modeler (...) MUST buy an E3 in order to depict Vinca's plane, not an E7.

As a modeller you're obviously correct.

I, as a historian, say that based on documents the airplane was an E-7.

Therefore, Vinca's mount was an E-7 that looked like an E-3. laugh.gif

Gen. Dénes
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
109
Posted: November 15, 2005 08:59 pm
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 85
Member No.: 488
Joined: January 29, 2005



QUOTE
Too bad, Vinca's 'Emils was actually an E-7, not an E-3...


...than your remark makes no sense...the Hasegawa kit, as detailed as a japonese kit can be, has no electrically operated cannons, nor "droppable" drop tank...this is the modeling part of this forum...

This post has been edited by 109 on November 15, 2005 09:02 pm
PMEmail Poster
Top
Dénes
Posted: November 15, 2005 09:26 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



QUOTE (109 @ Nov 16 2005, 02:59 AM)
QUOTE
Too bad, Vinca's 'Emils was actually an E-7, not an E-3...


...than your remark makes no sense...

It might not make sense to you, I don't know.

I said it clearly and concisely: "Vinca's mount was an E-7 that looked like an E-3" (the latter part of my sentence was directed towards the modellers). Regardless of the forum, I might add.

Gen. Dénes

PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
109
Posted: November 15, 2005 09:50 pm
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 85
Member No.: 488
Joined: January 29, 2005



Than why is "too bad"? ph34r.gif
PMEmail Poster
Top
Dénes
Posted: November 15, 2005 10:26 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



QUOTE (109 @ Nov 16 2005, 03:50 AM)
Than why is "too bad"? ph34r.gif

Because despite of what I've understood is a very nicely done model kit, the labelling (E-3) is erroneous.

Gen. Dénes
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Dénes
Posted: November 16, 2005 12:47 am
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



Here is an excerpt from a German document dated April 1943, detailing the German origin ARR airplanes used in combat at Stalingrad.
I hope the many capital if's, but's, etc. are now settled.

Gen. Dénes

user posted image

user posted image
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Dénes
Posted: November 16, 2005 01:14 am
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



I enclose a photo of a Bf 109E-7's nose section, taken from 'Messerschmitt Bf 109 Recognition Manual. A Guide to Variants, Weapons and Equipment', by Marco Fernández-Sommerau, published by Classic in the UK.
I think the author must know what he's talking about...

Gen. Dénes

user posted image
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
109
Posted: November 16, 2005 05:42 am
Quote Post


Fruntas
*

Group: Members
Posts: 85
Member No.: 488
Joined: January 29, 2005



Documents may be confusing (especially as 64 was in between 2 E7s (63 and 65)...but pictures NEVER lie...Probably many E3 were retrofitted to carry drop tanks or bombs, (especially on the Balkan front), thus becoming "sort of" E7s. But again the hallmark of E1-3 series is the canopy, as opposed to the E4-7
The spinner had many many forms, indeed, i have seen E1 with pointed spinners.

PS. indeed, Hasegawa sould have said on the cover: "Romanian E7 that looks like an E3" tongue.gif

user posted image
Picture from Aerodetail 109E book.

This post has been edited by 109 on November 16, 2005 06:04 am
PMEmail Poster
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Pages: (3) [1] 2 3  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.2647 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]