
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Romanian Army in the Second World War · Forum Guidelines |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
Pages: (61) « First ... 40 41 [42] 43 44 ... Last » ( Go to first unread post ) | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
MMM |
Posted on April 16, 2009 11:26 am
|
![]() General de divizie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1463 Member No.: 2323 Joined: December 02, 2008 ![]() |
You mean "re-upgrade" them? Oh, dear, with all our Romanian skills, we'll manage to make that a more expensive operation than buying new planes...
![]() -------------------- M
|
dead-cat |
Posted on August 11, 2009 03:44 pm
|
![]() Locotenent ![]() Group: Members Posts: 559 Member No.: 99 Joined: September 05, 2003 ![]() |
US Senate voted to stop F-22 production.
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/...production.html apparently the money runs short everywhere. |
MMM |
![]() |
![]() General de divizie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1463 Member No.: 2323 Joined: December 02, 2008 ![]() |
OoT: and it is said that US is almost out of WC! (world crisis, of course
![]() -------------------- M
|
Hadrian |
Posted on August 11, 2009 06:59 pm
|
![]() Sergent major ![]() Group: Members Posts: 245 Member No.: 875 Joined: April 09, 2006 ![]() |
1.75 billion for 7 fighters.
![]() I can understand why they stopped buying. The same happened with the B-2. |
MMM |
Posted on August 11, 2009 07:55 pm
|
![]() General de divizie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1463 Member No.: 2323 Joined: December 02, 2008 ![]() |
Let's not mix bombers with fighters! The bombers are supposed to be more expensive and needed in smaller numbers, AFAIK! But what about B-2, then?
-------------------- M
|
Hadrian |
Posted on August 11, 2009 08:24 pm
|
![]() Sergent major ![]() Group: Members Posts: 245 Member No.: 875 Joined: April 09, 2006 ![]() |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-2_Spirit
21 aircrafts produced, unit cost $737 million, program cost $44.75 billion. Initial procurement of 132 aircraft was planned in the mid-1980s, but was later reduced to 75. 21 were finally built. The Congress didn`t approve aditional funds for buying more, due to the costs. Anybody see some similarities? |
tomcat1974 |
Posted on August 12, 2009 06:27 am
|
Plutonier ![]() Group: Members Posts: 263 Member No.: 427 Joined: December 20, 2004 ![]() |
well they still have 187 F22 approved and payed for.
The move is to make more money for F-35, which are in greater need now. They have to replace a shitload of F-16 from AF and ANG |
MMM |
Posted on August 12, 2009 07:29 am
|
||
![]() General de divizie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1463 Member No.: 2323 Joined: December 02, 2008 ![]() |
I see a similarity between Gorbachev and the World Crisis, as causes for cutting budgets! But 21 B2's are a good force to be reckoned with... ![]() -------------------- M
|
||
dead-cat |
Posted on August 12, 2009 08:08 am
|
![]() Locotenent ![]() Group: Members Posts: 559 Member No.: 99 Joined: September 05, 2003 ![]() |
Gorbachev had no other choice, as the military expenditure of the SU in the late 80ies was around 40% of the state budget.
i'll be curious to see the price tag development for the F35, as the congress announced last year that the entire program will cost around 1 trillion (USD). "we" however, didn't even decide what to purchase, an ongoing "decisionmaking process" since 2003. This post has been edited by dead-cat on August 12, 2009 08:14 am |
MMM |
Posted on August 12, 2009 11:07 am
|
![]() General de divizie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1463 Member No.: 2323 Joined: December 02, 2008 ![]() |
No, I actually meant that Gorby's policy was a reason for US to finally cut down their defense budget. One trillion dollars? The figure alone is scarying - they could almost buy Africa with those money...
1.000.000.000.000 USD. -------------------- M
|
Hadrian |
Posted on August 12, 2009 11:54 am
|
![]() Sergent major ![]() Group: Members Posts: 245 Member No.: 875 Joined: April 09, 2006 ![]() |
Hmm...
I can look into the future... I can see some predicted aquisition number cuts... ![]() |
Victor |
Posted on August 12, 2009 12:22 pm
|
![]() Admin ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 4350 Member No.: 3 Joined: February 11, 2003 ![]() |
Please stick to to the topic.
|
MMM |
Posted on August 28, 2009 01:52 pm
|
![]() General de divizie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1463 Member No.: 2323 Joined: December 02, 2008 ![]() |
http://www.catavencu.ro/licuriciul_mare_da...sa_ul-9753.html
Could it be real? Will we find out soon? What F-16 (what block, that is...) will be "the one"? -------------------- M
|
Radub |
Posted on August 28, 2009 04:25 pm
|
![]() General de corp de armata ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1670 Member No.: 476 Joined: January 23, 2005 ![]() |
It is possible to get second-hand block 52 aircraft, but even block 40/42 will be adequate.
If that article is correct, they made the right choice, substance over style. Radu |
MMM |
Posted on August 29, 2009 10:09 am
|
![]() General de divizie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1463 Member No.: 2323 Joined: December 02, 2008 ![]() |
We shall find out til mid-november or so, as the "Lider Maximo" could use some good news in campaign
![]() This post has been edited by MMM on August 29, 2009 10:09 am -------------------- M
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |