WorldWar2.ro
Romanian Armed Forces
in the Second World War
Home + Organization + OoB + Aeronautics + Weapons + Decorations
Military Operations + Generals + Memoirs, Journals + Media + WW1 + Forum
Romana English
Military operations
Romania 1939-41
The static war (22 June - 3 July 1941)
Operation München - retaking Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina - 1941
The 3rd Army in the Ukraine and Crimea - 1941
The Battle of Odessa - 1941
Crimean Campaign - 1942
The 6th Corps in 1942
The 3rd Army in the Caucasus - 1942
The Battle of Stalingrad - 1942
The Taman bridgehead - 1943
“Festung” Crimea – 1943/44
Last stand in Crimea – 1944
Operation "60,000" – 1944
Romanian answer to the British ultimatum of 30 November 1941
Romanian answer to the British ultimatum of 30 November 1941
Romanian Royal Government has taken notice of the communique that Her Majesty’s Government transmitted by the means of United States of America’s Legation.

Given the situation brought about by this note, Romanian Government is obliged to offer for consideration the following review:

In June 1940 Romania was the victim of a grave aggression of USSR. Disregarding the rules of Nation Rights, the historical rights and the rights of self-determination, as well as the obligations formally assumed by the acts of 9 February 1929 and 3 July 1933, the Government of USSR has taken over Bessarabia, Bukovina and the Hertza Region of Moldavia.

Graver than this – and that is a fact that Romanian Royal Government wants to declare openly, USSR is the main offender in the case of territorial changes on other Romanian borders, changes that Romania had to endure because of the Soviet aggression.

In this light, all the acts of neutrality, non-aggression and recognition of rights made by USSR to Romania between 1929 and 1940, can be seen as dissimulation means for goals of expansion and usurpation upon Romania, USSR taking advantage of the first critical and complex international situation, to unleash not only her invasion, but to bring about hard conditions on Romania, which had to choose between its total collapse and anarchy in South-Eastern Europe, and a temporary state of usurpation. Having achieved its first goals of aggression, the Soviet government did not cease the provocations, showing up its will of continuing the policy of expansion and invasion.

We bring into attention:

  1. The brutal occupation of four islets on the Danube in the fall of 1940;
  2. Daily harasses at borders and the continuous strive to change the borderline by force;
  3. The tendency to take over the shipping routes on the seaside Danube;
  4. Steady intrusions of the Russian airforce, of 2-7 surveys per day during April-June, with all Romanian protests, proving the preparation of military operations against Romania;
  5. The massive concentration of military forces at the Northern and South-Eastern borders of Romania, with operative disposals and reconnaissance raids. The Soviet forces deployed on Romanian border comprised 30 infantry divisions, 8 cavalry divisions and 14 motorized brigades;
  6. The attempts of Commissar Molotov to sap the security of Romania, and the revealment of Russian goals of expansion, by speech or actions towards foreign statesmen;
  7. In the same time, Bessarabia and Bukovina were subject of organized destruction, tens of thousands of men were suppressed or imprisoned, hundreds of thousands Romanians were banished into Siberia, therefor population of centres as Kishinev was severely diminished.

In face of this grave situation and under the pressure of the threat rendered by the many Soviet divisions at the borders, on 22 June 1941 Romania has set in a military action for preserving its national entity against the never ceasing aggression and for re-establishing its stolen rights.

Romanian Royal Government strongly believes that its military action was the only way to fulfill its salvation from the Russian threat, a new aggression being impending, as proven afterwards by the most objective and categorical findings.

To defend its national entity, to re-establish its rights and to preserve the order and civilization of the South-East (of Europe), Romania had no other choice than to fight beside the Great Power (Germany) which engaged in this historical fight to defend the European civilization and to counter the invasion that was to come upon Romania and Finland first, then upon the rest of Europe.

Engaged in this war, Romania respects the rules of honor.

On 22 June, Great Britain was not allied with USSR. Nevertheless, on 30 November 1941, Great Britain considers that Romania carries out aggression acts against Russia, the ally of Great Britain.

Romania did not carry out and does not carry out aggression acts.

The military action which Romania has undertaken is a legitimate act of defense against the Russian aggression, begun in 1940 and following after, and the military operations for cleansing the border, for reducing the military center of Odessa, which at 45-km away from the liman of Dniester was a focus of permanent threat, as well as Crimea was a center of airpower covering the Romanian territory and oil; these operations are natural military actions on a front born by Russian aggression, and which Romania had to undertake in order to secure a zone of peace.

Romanian Government fulfills its duty to remember Her Majesty’s Government that:

  1. At the Paris Convention of 28 October 1920, Great Britain officially stated that “the borders regulated by the present treaty, as well as the Romanian sovereignty on the territories stipulated in it, cannot be reconsidered…”
  2. A series of international regulations between 1920 and 1939 required the borders to be respected in a solidary manner.
  3. The Great Britain’s declaration of guarantee, of 13 April 1939, stipulated that “in case of an action that threatens the independence of Romania … Her Majesty’s Government is obliged to offer its assistance”.

In spite of these, when on 26 June 1940 USSR divulged its aggression, accomplished in the following days, Her Majesy’s Government did not undertake any action to defend or to respect the guarantees offered to Romania.

The Romanian Royal Government, remembering Her Majesty’s Government the terrible sufferings and threats, usurpations and occupations that Romanian people had endured since the 18th century from its Eastern neighbors, and the healthy anti-communist position that Romania displayed in the last two decades, defending since 1919 the South-Eastern (Europe) against social disorder and invasion, must emphasize the fact that in the past, this kind of attitude was strongly supported by Great Britain.

Arguments can be found in many declarations of English statesmen between 1919 and 1939, declarations which raised the alarm of communist threat against the social and political security of Europe.

Romanian Royal Government believes that what Romania had accomplished by this day, it was the only thing that could be done for defending the South-Eastern (Europe) and for preserving the Great institutions of European civilization.

Romania was the victim of an aggression with grave consequences in 1940, and it was living under the threat of further aggressions; what it did in 1941 was the only thing to be done. But this is nothing else than a self defense and a sacrifice for civilization.

6 December 1941

Author: Dragos Pusca
 Top
User Comments Add Comment
dan  (21 June 2010)
E NU inteleg pozitia Marii Britanii ref. la situatia Romaniei...englezii nici atunci si mai ales acum NU dau doi bani pe noi, la fel si americanii...care ne-au bombardat 2 ani (43 si 44) iar noi ii consideram prieteni :)) Macar cu Rusia am dus un razboi "corect" de eliberare pana la Nistru, apoi unul de cotropire...dar ca pierzatori de razboi rusii puteau sa ne pedepseasca mai rau in 45 la cat rau le-am facut si noi in 42-43... Fiecare popor are istoria lui, si nu cred ca mai e de actualitate sa confundam poporul rus cu Stalin, ce a fost a fost...iar in contextul economic si geostrategic actual rusii mi se par mai de incredere decat americanii!!

Juden  (17 March 2010)
Romania avea numai dusmani la granite,care asteptau sa profite de ocazie ca sa preia teritoriu.O impotrivire in 1940 impotriva URSS-ului ar fi fost catastrofal.Deoarece vecini nostri unguri erau bine pusi pe pozitie ca sa intre in Transilvania si sa o anexeze,mai era si armata germana bine mechanizata si insetata dupa combustibilul de la Ploiesti. sa nu uitam de tovarasi nostri bulgari care nu mai puteau sa doarma de cand au pierdut Cadrilaterul.
CONCLUZIE;Romania ar fi imparatasit aceeasi soarta ca Polonia ,daca ar fi tinut cont de demnitate si de onoare.(Finlanda a ales sa lupte impotriva urss-ului si a  izbutit intr-un final)

florin  (4 October 2009)
Romania nu avea nici o sansa sa atace singura Urss ,in 1940

cu atit mai mult cu cit s-a dovedit ulterior ca si impreuna cu Germania care era o putere militara de prim rang,Finlanda ,ungaria si Italia, a fost o aventura tragica acest atac.A se vedea " Ultima Republica" si Spargatorul de gheata" ale lui Victor Suvorov

tiberiu oprina  (13 February 2008)
asa e .. daca se putea face ceva trebuia facut in 1940 in iunie ... nu in iulie '41.

Tomsa Mihai  (7 August 2007)
Trebuia sa raspundem cu actiuni militare, imediat,atunci in iunie 1940, nu dupa un an.