Romanian Military History Forum - Part of Romanian Army in the Second World War Website



Pages: (3) [1] 2 3   ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Map: 'Romania' south of Bulgaria?
Dénes
Posted: December 01, 2003 06:00 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



I found the image of a 221-year-old British map, which shows 'Romania' located south of Bulgaria, on the southwestern shores of the Black Sea. See image: user posted image
It's obviously an error, but what could be the source?
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Geto-Dacul
Posted: December 01, 2003 06:57 pm
Quote Post


Plutonier adjutant
*

Group: Members
Posts: 383
Member No.: 9
Joined: June 18, 2003



It's not an error, Dénes! During medieval times, Byzantine and Ottoman Thracia was also called "Romania" (the name of the Eastern Roman Empire), because of the great number of Vlachs living there, and the central administrative center which was Constantinople (the "new Rome"). eventually, with the creation of a Bulgarian state, that "Romania" disapeared, with the majority of the Vlachs there.

http://www.friesian.com/romania.htm

Getu'
PMUsers Website
Top
Victor
Posted: December 01, 2003 08:05 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4350
Member No.: 3
Joined: February 11, 2003



QUOTE
During medieval times, Byzantine and Ottoman Thracia was also called \"Romania\" (the name of the Eastern Roman Empire), because of the great number of Vlachs living there


Actually it was called Romania because the Byzantines (the term "Byzantine" was introduced by modern historians) called themselves "Romans", not because there were so many Vlachs there.
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Geto-Dacul
Posted: December 01, 2003 08:14 pm
Quote Post


Plutonier adjutant
*

Group: Members
Posts: 383
Member No.: 9
Joined: June 18, 2003



Victor wrote :

QUOTE
Actually it was called Romania because the Byzantines (the term \"Byzantine\" was introduced by modern historians) called themselves \"Romans\", not because there were so many Vlachs there.


After the death of the Thracian emperor Phocas, a sery of Greek dynasties took the power, beginning with emperor Heraclius. The Eastern Roman Empire ceased to be "Roman", and became "Greek". But the Westerners continued to call it "Roman Empire". The Greeks called themselves "Romei".

user posted image

Follis with emperor Phocas (602-610)
Source : http://www.pdxcoinclub.org/gallery/AeFolli...lis_Phocas.html
PMUsers Website
Top
Victor
Posted: December 01, 2003 08:16 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4350
Member No.: 3
Joined: February 11, 2003



An how is this different from what I said?
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Korne
Posted: December 01, 2003 08:17 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 31
Member No.: 28
Joined: July 06, 2003



Maybe this is a confusion with Rumelia (spelled also as Roumelia), which corresponds to that particular region on the map.
PM
Top
Geto-Dacul
Posted: December 01, 2003 08:19 pm
Quote Post


Plutonier adjutant
*

Group: Members
Posts: 383
Member No.: 9
Joined: June 18, 2003



Rumelia is the Turkish name for "Romania"... Just like Istanbul is for "Constantinople"...

Victor, when the pope Inocentius III converted Ionita Caloian to the Catholic faith, from only then those Vlachs were considered as "Rome's descendents", and the region were Caloian ruled was named "Romania" by the Westerners.

Getu'
PMUsers Website
Top
Korne
Posted: December 01, 2003 08:27 pm
Quote Post


Soldat
*

Group: Members
Posts: 31
Member No.: 28
Joined: July 06, 2003



QUOTE
Rumelia is the Turkish name for \"Romania\"... Just like Istanbul is for \"Constantinople\"...

Didn't know that, Getule... That explains it then
PM
Top
Victor
Posted: December 01, 2003 08:39 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4350
Member No.: 3
Joined: February 11, 2003



The Asans never ruled that area on the map (Contantinople).

I was referring to the fact that the Byzantines (ethnical Greeks) considered themselves Romans and called themsellves this way.
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Carol I
Posted: December 01, 2003 09:42 pm
Quote Post


General de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2250
Member No.: 136
Joined: November 06, 2003



I have found this piece of information about Rumelia on the net. It creates the impression that historically Rumelia was centred around Sofia.

Carol I
PM
Top
Dénes
Posted: December 01, 2003 09:42 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



QUOTE
During medieval times, Byzantine and Ottoman Thracia was also called \"Romania\" (the name of the Eastern Roman Empire

Thanks for the interesting details. I learned quite a few things.

So this is probably why the English spell the current country's name 'Rumania', as to avoid confusion with the above-described historical 'Romania'...
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Carol I
Posted: December 01, 2003 09:49 pm
Quote Post


General de armata
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2250
Member No.: 136
Joined: November 06, 2003



QUOTE
So this is probably why the British spell the current country's anme 'Rumania', as to avoid confusion with the above-described historical 'Romania'...


Actually I heard many British saying that "Rumania" is the old way of spelling the name of the country, while the correct one now is "Romania". In fact I had to remind them of the spelling with "u" and they replied something along the lines "Oh really, I think I have seen it only in some old papers. Anyhow, no one uses it anymore."

And if BBC still maintains the tradition of "Queen's English", ROMANIA must be the correct way of spelling the name now.

Carol I
PM
Top
Dénes
Posted: December 01, 2003 10:21 pm
Quote Post


Admin
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 4368
Member No.: 4
Joined: June 17, 2003



This issue was discussed and settled here earlier.
In short, both the classical 'Rumania' and the recently used 'Romania' spelling forms are correct and accepted in the contemporary UK English language.
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
Geto-Dacul
Posted: December 01, 2003 11:53 pm
Quote Post


Plutonier adjutant
*

Group: Members
Posts: 383
Member No.: 9
Joined: June 18, 2003



Victor wrote :

QUOTE
The Asans never ruled that area on the map (Contantinople).


Indeed, Constantinople remained under "latine" hands until the Paleologus dynasty chased them... But Thracia with its capital at Andrinople, was controled for a period of time by the Asans.

Dénes wrote :

QUOTE
So this is probably why the English spell the current country's name 'Rumania', as to avoid confusion with the above-described historical 'Romania'...


If you want so :wink: I too would prefere more "Rumania" than "Romania"! smile.gif

Getu'
PMUsers Website
Top
Chandernagore
Posted: December 03, 2003 09:13 pm
Quote Post


Locotenent colonel
Group Icon

Group: Banned
Posts: 818
Member No.: 106
Joined: September 22, 2003



QUOTE
Actually I heard many British saying that \"Rumania\" is the old way of spelling the name of the country, while the correct one now is \"Romania\". In fact I had to remind them of the spelling with \"u\" and they replied something along the lines \"Oh really, I think I have seen it only in some old papers. Anyhow, no one uses it anymore.\"



As Dénes said. Both spellings are accepted and correct in English. You will find Rumania quite often.
PM
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Pages: (3) [1] 2 3  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 






[ Script Execution time: 0.0758 ]   [ 14 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]